PUBLIC INPUT?
Posted by Joan Seeman on May 12, 1999 at 19:13:56:In Reply to: Why just one side of the story? posted by Tim Wheeler on May 04, 1999 at 13:01:49:
I'VE NOT HEARD ANY REPORTS AS TO WHY THIS SITE TECHNICALLY MIGHT FAIL.....
I USED TO LIVE CLOSE TO ROCKY FLATS..... THE DOE WAS GOING TO BURN TONS OF
RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN MY BACKYARD IN AN EXPERIMENTAL INCINERATOR.
IF WE CITIZENS HADN'T DONE OUR OWN HOMEWORK ON THE CONTROVERSY,
INCINERATION WOULD HAVE COME ON LINE. THANK GOODNESS IT DIDN'T...........I "HAVE" READ SUPPORTING DATA ON THE SUCCESSES OF WIPP..........
I'M INTERESTED IN COUNTER INFORMATION........MOST INTERESTING, WILL BE THE APPROVAL OF THE RCRA PERMIT BY THE EPA.!!!!!!
MIXED WASTE IS A SERIOUS ISSUE.....JUST RECENTLY I DETERMINED THAT AN AUDIT WAS TO TAKE PLACE AT ROCKY FLATS.....
UNFORTUNATELY FOR THE DOE AND USEPA, THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WAS
NOT OVER.......EVEN THOUGH THEY HAD SCHEDULED TO ARRIVE IN DENVER ON
APRIL 12. THE COMMENT PERIOD WAS NOT TO CONCLUDE UNTIL APRIL 26........
USEPA HAD TO CHANGE THEIR SCHEDULE UNTIL THE PUBLIC COMMENT
PERIOD ENDED.NO ONE IN COLORADO EVEN KNEW THAT WE WERE TO COMMENT ON THE AUDIT OF
THE TRANSURANIC WASTE......GUESS WHEN THE USEPA SHOWED UP TO AUDIT?
ONE DAY AFTER THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ENDED.
ARE THEY INTERESTED IN PUBLIC INPUT?
SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE!!!
jsI