Sound Facility?
Posted by Joan Seeman on April 10, 1999 at 23:39:55:In Reply to: Monitored retrievable storage posted by John Tauxe on March 24, 1999 at 17:03:20:
I'm still troubled at your generic conversations about WIPP. What is a sound facility? From what
I am beginning to read, this site is as bad as the proposed Lyons Kansas site. I thought
there was no possiblity of brine at WIPP?............Please explain why you believe this is not
just a dump? Are you knowledgeable regarding landfills? State of the Art Dumps that have
leaked...........that have created Superfund Sites nationwide! Do you not believe that WIPP
is an experiment? INEEL has an Experimental Incinerator that has just come on line...
and that is exactly what they call it.........for Tru Mixed Waste........Do you wonder why there is controversey regarding the Tru Mixed Waste?
This issue is not so benign an issue in the arena of waste management........Why do you make comments about DOE? What is a real scientist? Some scientists work
for various industries/contractors for $$$. Do you always believe them? Are they always objective?
Depends.......I'm amazed that you feel so confident in science...........stills seems to me that you haven't
researched scientifcally the controversies that surround this site from some of the other "real
scientists".......guess it depends on your choice of "real scientists"
- science John Tauxe 4/26/99 (0)
- Science vs. Psuedoscience Timothy Wheeler 4/12/99 (11)
- Bias? Joan Seeman 4/16/99 (10)
- Bias Tim Wheeler 4/19/99 (9)
- Trust? Joan Seeman 5/12/99 (6)
- Trust John Tauxe 5/20/99 (2)
- Nuclear Waste Management Joan Seeman 5/23/99 (1)
- reply John Tauxe 5/24/99 (0)
- New Generation waste sites vs. old generation sites Tim Wheeler 5/14/99 (2)
- NM Environmental Evaluation Group Joan Seeman 5/16/99 (1)
- The EEG is NOT WIPP friendly!!! Tim Wheeler 5/19/99 (0)
- Trust? Joan Seeman 5/12/99 (0)
- Trust? Joan Seeman 5/12/99 (0)