NM Environmental Evaluation Group
Posted by Joan Seeman on May 16, 1999 at 21:38:45:In Reply to: New Generation waste sites vs. old generation sites posted by Tim Wheeler on May 14, 1999 at 10:24:07:
Tim,
Why do you trust the evaluations of the EEG group?
Are they knowledgeable about waste management?
Please send me a list of who they are and their credentials.What do you mean the DOE deserves criticism about waste management of the past....and yet
you trust them to know what they're doing in this situation? This doesn't make sense.Tell me about the scientists that are opposed to this site.
What do you know about their concerns?If you evaluate oversite and compliance issues, you will see that there really is very
little oversite and inspections by the agencies entrusted to do this. This process has been
going on for years........and continues to fail. I do environmental research on technology
successes...........THERE ARE NO TECHNOLGIES THAT ARE PROVEN SUCCESSFUL
TO DEAL WITH THESE ISSUES........It really is sad to citizens such as yourself promoting this project with no facts regarding
waste management..............hazardous waste managment at that........and believe
this is STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY FOR NEW MEXICO!!!!!! The State of New
Mexico and its' citizens should continue to fight against this obvious common sense.....
.....pending disaster for America!!!!!!!! I would imagine that Superfund Site wouldn't be
a classification that would suit this situation in the future............
- The EEG is NOT WIPP friendly!!! Tim Wheeler 5/19/99 (0)