mp3 –
written version with links – ff Update 7-12-13
Thank you to all who participated in this effort to ensure a public hearing about the proposed expansion of WIPP’s mission!
Current Activities
This week the U.S. House is voting on the Appropriations bill that funds nuclear weapons. And Rep. Quigley (D-IL) will be offering an amendment that will give nuclear bombs a budget cut.
Over the last few years, spending on nuclear weapons and nuclear bomb plants has continued to grow unchecked. Especially wasteful is the plan to overhaul the B61 nuclear bomb, with an eventual total cost of $10 billion by 2019. This is way too much money for a bomb that is dangerous and outdated, and it is urgent that we slow down the spending before it is too late.
Call your representative now at (202) 224-3121 to vote for the Quigley amendment to cut funds for the B61 nuclear bomb.
Cutting nukes spending in the Republican-controlled House can be an uphill battle. But we have been working with allies in Congress to stop this program that would overhaul 400 B61 nuclear bombs at a total price tag of $25 million each. We can see some wins, if our representatives feel the pressure.
Call your representative at (202) 224-3121 right now. To look up your representative click here: http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/
Use this sample message and add your own words:
“My name is [your name] and I live in [your city]. I am calling to tell Rep. [your rep’s name] to vote for the Quigley amendment to the Appropriations bill to cut excess funds for the B61 nuclear bomb.”
This is an important chance to cut wasteful spending on dangerous and outdated nuclear weapons. You can convince Congress to make this a priority.
Thank you! Together we are making a difference!
written version – f Update 7-5-13
ACTION ALERT
In collaboration with our colleagues at Peace Action, Western States Legal Foundation, and the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy, please sign the petition in support of the U.S. participating in the UN High-Level meeting on nuclear disarmament on September 26.
Here are two resources:
the letter to the president: http://peaceblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/making-global-elimination-of-nuclear-weapons-a-reality
A terrific article by American Friends Service Commitee’s Joseph Gerson on Truthout, which makes the key arguments for the elimination of nuclear weapons: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/17240-president-obama-in-berlin-why-not-ask-for-more
mp3 – 062813
written version – f Update 6-28-13
Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium flyer – TBDC 7-13-13 event flyer
mp3 – 061413
written version – f Update 6-14-13
ACTION ALERT
Presidents Obama and Putin are meeting Monday and Tuesday, June 17 and 18, in Northern Ireland. Reductions in the number of nuclear weapons each country possesses are on the agenda. The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation encourages you to take action by asking Presidents Obama and Putin to make a mutual pledge of no first use of nuclear weapons. Please go to the Facebook pages of either the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation at wagingpeace or CCNS to take action.
ACTION ALERT – ACT NOW!
Encourage Los Alamos National Laboratory to incorporate more green solutions into their proposal to cleanup stormwater runoff at two polluted areas that flow into the lush Sandia wetlands and on to the Rio Grande.
Deadline for comments is tomorrow, Friday June 14th!
You can cut and paste the letter below and email it to envoutreach@lanl.gov or click here to send a comment from the Amigos Bravos’ website at http://www.amigosbravos.org/action.php?action=13
Background: CCNS has been working as a part of the collaborative group “Communities for Clean Water” to advocate for effective cleanup of stormwater discharges from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). In collaboration with our CCW partners (Amigos Bravos, Honor Our Pueblo Existence and the New Mexico Acequia Association and other non-governmental organizations) we sued the Department of Energy for violations of the Clean Water Act at LANL. In 2011 we settled that lawsuit and received funding for experts and together set up a process to monitor cleanup of the water that runs off of LANL property. We also participated in the negotiations of the federal stormwater permit that outlines requirements to clean up this runoff. As part of this process we have been advocating for the use of Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development approaches to stopping pollution from running off the lab during rain storms.
LANL is proposing “alternative compliance” measures at two areas in Sandia Canyon covered under their permit. The permit requires LANL to offer a 45-day public comment period on their proposal and to formally respond to all comments submitted by Friday, June 14th.
The letter to cut and paste:
Patricia Jones
Los Alamos National Laboratory
P.O. Box 1663, MS M996
Los Alamos, NM 87545
Re: Alternative Compliance Request for S-SMA-2 and S-SMA-.25
Dear Ms. Jones,
As a citizen who cares about the health of Rio Grande Watershed, I submit the following comments on the Alternative Compliance Request for S-SMA-2 and S-SMA-.25 in Sandia Canyon.
While I am encouraged by Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL’s) willingness to incorporate some Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development concepts into the alternative compliance proposal for S-SMA-.25 the two proposals do not adequately protect water quality in Sandia Canyon and the Rio Grande.
A more holistic approach to addressing runoff must be adopted to decrease levels of contaminants flowing through Sandia Canyon and into the Rio Grande. To meet Target Action Levels (TALs) for pollutants in the stormwater more must be done at each SMA. Specifically, control measures such as cisterns to capture roof runoff and bioretention gardens placed strategically around each SMA would drastically reduce PCBs and heavy metals found in the stormwater runoff In addition, regular monitoring and maintenance must be done after installation of these control measures to evaluate their effectiveness.
Cisterns, contrary to statements made in the S-SMA-.25 proposal, do not require an unreasonable amount of maintenance and should be incorporated, not only into these alternative compliance proposals, but broadly across LANL property. In general, a much more proactive approach to retrofitting existing buildings as well as incorporating green stormwater practices into new buildings should be a priority at LANL.
Los Alamos National Laboratory has a unique opportunity to be a scientific and technical leader in the arid southwest in developing effective green measures to control stormwater and protect the Rio Grande. I request that LANL steps up to the challenge and uses this opportunity to protect the Sandia Canyon wetlands and the Rio Grande.
Sincerely,
Comments are due to the New Mexico Environment Department tomorrow, Monday, June 10, 2013 about the Department of Energy’s (DOE) proposal to bring high-level nuclear waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The waste would come from DOE sites at Hanford, Washington; Savannah River, South Caroline; and the Idaho National Laboratory. A sample comment letter is below for you to use. Please include your name and address and other contact information and email it to trais.kliphuis@state.nm.us. Ms. Kliphuis is a Program Manager at the New Mexico Environment Department, which regulates hazardous waste at WIPP.
Sample public comment letter – No to HLW at WIPP 6-9-13
For more information, please see recent CCNS News Updates.
“Opposition Growing to DOE Proposal to Dispose of High-Level Waste at WIPP” – mp3 042613 and written text f Update 4-26-13
“Tom Carpenter to Speak in Albuquerque on April 23rd about DOE Proposal to Dispose of High-Level Waste at WIPP” – mp3 041913 and written text f Update 4-19-13
“Public Forum April 23rd in Albuquerque about the DOE Proposal to Dispose of High-Level Waste at WIPP” – mp3 041213 and written text f Update 4-19-13
“Public Forum April 23rd in Albuquerque about the DOE Proposal to Dispose of High-Level Waste at WIPP” – mp3 041213 and written text f Update 4-12-13
“DOE Wants to Eliminate High-Level Waste Prohibition in the WIPP Permit” – mp3 031513
“DOE Says It Can Bring Hanford High-Level Waste to WIPP” – mp3 030813
