Proposed Amendments Would Store High-Level Radioactive Waste in New Mexico and West Texas and Accelerate Yucca Mountain Licensing
Proposed amendments to the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act would accelerate two proposals to bring some of the nation’s commercial high-level radioactive waste to New Mexico and West Texas. Congressman John Shimkus introduced the proposed amendments which would accelerate thousands of shipments of spent fuel rods on trucks, rail, and barges. The bill, numbered H.R. 3053, would also restart the forced licensing of Yucca Mountain, a Department of Energy (DOE) site located 90 miles north of Las Vegas, Nevada, in a seismic and volcano-ridden area. It is interesting that Congressman Shimkus represents Illinois, which has the largest number of nuclear power plants in the nation, with 11. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3053
Both privately held corporations, Holtec, International, and Waste Control Specialists, LLC (WCS), have submitted license applications to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for consolidated interim storage facilities. The Shimkus bill brings back a term from the past – “monitored retrievable storage,” or MRS, to describe these proposed facilities. If approved, the bill would allow some, but not all, of the waste currently stored at nuclear power plants around the country, to be shipped to New Mexico or the WCS facility on the Texas-New Mexico border.
Holtec is asking to store 100,000 tons of plutonium fuel at a site halfway between Hobbs and Carlsbad, New Mexico, in Lea County. WCS is asking to store 40,000 tons of plutonium fuel at its hazardous, toxic and radioactive storage and disposal dump located in Andrews County, five miles east of Eunice, New Mexico.
Last Friday, WCS announced a private equity firm, J.F. Lehman & Co., bought the 14,900-acre facility. Lehman also owns NorthStar Group Services, a nuclear decommissioning specialist, that could supply a pipeline of waste to WCS.
Despite DOE spending millions of taxpayer dollars to explore Yucca Mountain, it is not a viable solution for disposing of high-level radioactive waste. Even though some people hope Yucca Mountain would open, the transportation threats alone would impact millions living along the truck and rail transportation routes over a period of 50 years. See State of Nevada’s January 24, 2018 powerpoint presentation, Yucca Mountain Update and Transportation Impacts, to the U.S. Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting, Washington, DC at http://www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/news2018/pdf/nanp180124mayors_conf.pdf
The Shimkus bill continues the policy of the 1987 Nuclear Waste Policy Act to deny Nevada a voice. The 1987 law designated Yucca Mountain as the only proposed site for DOE to study as a geologic repository. Another bill, H.R. 456, called the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act, would give consent options to Nevada and affected local and tribal governments regarding Yucca Mountain. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/456 For Nevada’s analysis, please see, State of Nevada’s Comments on Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2017, H.R. 3053,” by Robert Halstead, Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects, dated January 19, 2018 at https://titus.house.gov/sites/titus.house.gov/files/wysiwyg_uploaded/NV%20NWPAA%20Final%20Comments.pdf
Joni Arends, of CCNS, urged the public to, “Please contact your congress people to urge them to oppose H.R. 3053, the Shimkus bill, and support H.R. 456, the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act.”
Tags: CISF, consolidated interim storage facilities, Department of Energy, DOE, H.R. 3053, H.R. 456, Holtec International, Illinois nuclear power plants, J.F. Lehman & Co., John Shimkus, monitored retrievable storage, MRS, NorthStar Group Services, nuclear decommissioning, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act, Nuclear Waste Policy Act, waste control specialists, Yucca Mountain
Leave a reply »
So, where is the H.R. 3053, the Shimkus Bill and the H.R. 456, the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act relating which Committee’s were assigned to listen to them, etc.? Lastly, where is our NM Congressional Delegation official positions on these bills? Which one’s are opposing or endorsing these bills as we speak? Thanks.
Yucca mountain needs to be stopped for good. Your article was excellent. It is obvious it is unsafe and any others have their own agenda ! Our Governor and Dean Heller have been excellent and precise with all data ! There are other alternatives as defined also. Thank you.
Hello,I check your blogs named “Proposed Amendments Would Store High-Level Radioactive Waste in New Mexico and West Texas and Accelerate Yucca Mountain Licensing « Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety” like every week.Your writing style is awesome, keep up the good work! And you can look our website about free proxy.